Gone to the disaster? The US, Russia is tightening its grip on negotiations

WASHINGTON (AP) – The failure of last week’s summit to resolve growing conflicts in Ukraine has put Russia, the United States and European allies in an undisclosed location after the Cold War, posing serious challenges for senior players to avoid a full-blown confrontation. .

Unlike previous conflicts that have existed since the fall of the Soviet Union, the tensions in Ukraine and the seemingly insurmountable differences between Washington and Moscow pose real dangers of debilitating economic warfare and war conflicts fueled by the dangers of illiteracy and extremism. .

For the US and NATO and its European allies, the massive retreat of about 100,000 Russian troops now deployed near the Ukrainian border will confirm that Russian President Vladimir Putin is intent on negotiating with confidence. For the Russian people, the complete Western refusal to consider NATO’s expansion of sanctions and the withdrawal of troops from Eastern Europe is a false testimony.

The potential confession is hampered by the fact that either Putin or President Joe Biden do not want to be seen as backward in front of the people at home or outside.

The rejection so far has been a downfall of what some see as irregularities and ambitions that have given up hope of negotiations in the limbo, with the US and allies blaming Russia for unjustified tensions and the Russians complaining again. Americans are cruel.

Some believe that the answer to those questions is yes.

“The differences of opinion are so great that new and dangerous escalation may be necessary for parties to open their minds and seek agreements,” Fyodor Lukyanov, head of the Moscow-based Council for Foreign and Defense Policies, said in a statement.

To Western scholars, it looks like Putin will have to compromise if conflicts are to be avoided. Some think that Putin’s views on NATO, which has been plagued by years of questioning and debate, may have given the alliance a new lease on life.

“This is an uncertain and difficult time without any definite solution unless Putin regrets it,” said Jeff Rathke, a European scholar and former US ambassador to the current American Institute for Contemporary German Studies at Johns Hopkins University.

“They have made a mess of it and it is difficult to leave if they do not get the security reforms in Europe that they say they want.

Biden, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan to Chief Wendy Sherman say that Russia is the one that has to “pre-empt”. Reducing or facing sanctions is the opposite of what he wants: NATO’s presence in Eastern Europe and armed Ukraine.

However, in Russia, officials say that the shoe is on the other foot. They have described their demands as “absolute necessities” and argued that the inability of whites to meet with them makes discussions on other issues irrelevant.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Friday that Russia had tried in vain for years to persuade the US and its allies to negotiate a non-proliferation of nuclear weapons to Europe, to limit military sanctions and laws to avoid a dangerous confrontation between Russia. and the combined military and aircraft until the US and NATO expressed a desire to discuss the issue this week.

He further added that the change was due to the US desire to suspend Russia’s interest, adding that Moscow would focus on NATO’s non-alignment. He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture, and that his confession had been obtained through torture.

“Frankly, everyone understands that the prospect of finding a partnership depends on the US,” Lavrov said. He further added that “anything the US says about the need to negotiate with its allies in the negotiations is” just a ruse and an attempt to stop the process. “

So, arguing.

The Western approach has been “a concerted effort to address the problem,” said Andrew Weiss, vice president of education at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which oversees research in Washington and Moscow on Russia and Eurasia.

“The problem we have is that the Russian people are businessmen, and they have shown us in several cases, in 2014, 2008, that they are ready to go to war to get these things, and no,” he said, “and that is a protest.

Russia’s strong and steadfast leadership has led some to believe that Moscow will only rise after receiving both sides’ expectations of a legitimate, unconstitutional document from the US and NATO to ratify their demands.

Indeed, Russia’s chief negotiator, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, said on Thursday that Moscow could respond to the rejection and expansion of goods outside Europe by sending troops to Cuba and Venezuela. The US has called the idea “bluster” and will respond positively if it does.

“The lack of a solution for the embassy is exacerbating the problem,” wrote Dmitri Trenin, director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, in an online survey.

Trenin predicted that “military and technical” tactics that Putin said Russia would take if the Western powers rejected their proposals could include “various moves … with Belarus and closer ties with their Chinese counterparts.”

However, there is a danger that in the face of his anger at NATO, Putin may unwittingly extend his hand, especially to new members such as the Baltic states, Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic.

“For the countries that have joined NATO since the Cold War, you can say that NATO is more important to them now than it was a year ago or 2014,” Rathke said. security has been taught in the last few months, and this is getting worse. “


Isachenkov also quoted from Moscow. Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed to the report.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.