A California judge alleges that Google’s obscene agreements violate state law

Google should review its privacy policy in accordance with this long case from an anonymous employee. According to to The Washington Post, a California Supreme Court judge has ruled that a Google employee’s confidentiality agreements violate state law. The rules barring an employee from discussing his job with his employer were inconsistent and thus banned from the state, the judge said.

The online company initially persuaded the judge to dismiss the employee’s allegations in the belief that federal laws violated California law. However, the appellate court reversed the decision, stating that the federal law did little to protect freedom of speech and employment. Google has declined to comment on the decision or any appeals decision.

The result will not allow Google employees to discuss trade secrets if they are confirmed. It can allow people to discuss the work experience, however, and it can also be easy for job seekers to switch roles without fear of litigation. It can also offer more opportunities rape and abuse to discuss their reasons for leaving the company, even though California laws have already concluded non-disclosure agreements that prevent victims from talking about the incident.

This decision could have far-reaching consequences for the California technical sector. QH Law partner Ramsey Hanafi sold a Send that many large tech companies gag the same rules. Like it or not, Silicon Valley companies may need to renew their agreements and agree that it will be easier for employees to leave or realize. cultures use toxins.

All sales supported by Engadget are selected by our writing team, independent of our parent company. Some of our articles include links to links. When you purchase something through one of these links, we may be able to find a partner.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.